#ICYMI: Before You Hit Send: The Truth About Sharing Sensitive Info in ChatGPT Conversations

In the era of artificial intelligence, ChatGPT has become a trusted companion for millions—offering help with everything from writing and brainstorming to answering deeply personal questions. But are all your ChatGPT conversations truly private? The answer is more nuanced than many realize, and it could have serious implications.

Can ChatGPT Chats Be Used as Court Evidence?

Yes. Conversations with ChatGPT can be used as evidence in court. Unlike privileged talks with lawyers or doctors, AI chats lack legal confidentiality. This means if a court finds the content relevant, your ChatGPT interactions can be subpoenaed and treated like emails or texts.

OpenAI’s CEO Sam Altman publicly acknowledged this reality, warning users not to assume immunity from legal scrutiny when chatting with AI. Courts treat these digital conversations as part of the user’s digital footprint, potentially revealing crucial information in civil, criminal, or corporate disputes.

Why Does This Matter?

• No Privilege Protection: The lack of legal protection means anything you share—even personal or sensitive details—could be exposed in court without your consent.
• Evidentiary Admissibility: Judges decide whether to admit AI chats based on relevance and rules of evidence. While some skepticism remains about the AI’s reliability (due to issues like factual “hallucinations”), the records themselves can still influence cases.
• AI Hallucinations and Legal Risks: Courts have already seen disputes complicated by AI-generated misinformation. For instance, lawyers who submitted briefs using ChatGPT-generated, but fabricated, case citations were sanctioned by judges in multiple jurisdictions in 2025. These incidents reveal both the risk of AI content being inaccurate and the legal system’s evolving stance on AI use.

Real-World Cases Illustrate the Risks

Several lawyers in the United States faced court sanctions for using ChatGPT to draft legal documents. These documents contained fictitious precedents and incorrect legal principles. A Massachusetts judge criticized a lawyer for not verifying AI-generated content independently. The judge stressed that the responsibility lies with the user, not the AI. Similar cases have also appeared in South Africa and Australia. This signals a global legal reckoning over AI’s reliability and ethical use.

Furthermore, court rulings reinforce that AI chats can be forced into disclosure during litigation, regulatory investigations, or other official inquiries. The absence of privilege means that your AI conversations could be part of discovery or evidence production.

Looking Ahead: The Need for “AI Privilege”

Some experts and advocates argue for the creation of an “AI privilege” — a legal protection similar to attorney-client privilege that would secure AI interactions. OpenAI’s leadership also supports developing a broader ethical and legal framework to safeguard users’ privacy when communicating with AI.

So, until such frameworks exist, treat ChatGPT conversations with the same caution as any other unprotected digital communication.

Bottom Line: Your chats with ChatGPT are not confidential or privileged by law. They can be requested and used as evidence in courts, making it crucial to be mindful of what you share. The AI revolution presents exciting possibilities but also legal responsibilities that every user should understand.

For more of these updates, catch in on The Crossover with CHANTE, 10AM-2PM. Your Feel Good Station.